The Supreme Court

home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search

/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / ascii / 1993 / order / 112993.zor < prev next >

Wrap

Text File | 1993-11-29 | 39.6 KB | 1,384 lines

ORDER LIST MONDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 1993 CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION 93-5382 MAHON, JOHNNIE RAY V. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL. The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc., 508 U. S. (1993). ORDERS IN PENDING CASES No. LORRAINE SPILLER, ET AL. V. MAINE, ET AL. The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out-of-time is denied. D-1294 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DIANE WILP SPIES It having been reported to the Court that Diane Wilp Spies, of Sherwood, Oregon, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Oregon and this Court by order of August 26, 1993, having suspended the said Diane Wilp Spies from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued; It is ordered that the said Diane Wilp Spies be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that her name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1299 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN S. MATTHEWS It having been reported to the Court that John S. Matthews, of Tampa, Florida, has resigned from the practice of law before the Supreme Court of Florida and this Court by order of September 24, 1993, having suspended the said John S. Matthews from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said John S. Matthews be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1300 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PETER R. STROMER It having been reported to the Court that Peter R. Stromer, of San Jose, California, has resigned from the practice of law before the Supreme Court of California and this Court by order of September 24, 1993, having suspended the said Peter R. Stromer from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Peter R. Stromer be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1302 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LINDA ANTIONETTE WILLIS It having been reported to the Court that Linda Antionette Willis, of Cleveland, Ohio, has been suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Ohio and this Court by order of September 24, 1993, having suspended the said Linda Antionette Willis from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Linda Antionette Willis be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that her name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1303 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL JOSEPH BLAKE It having been reported to the Court that Michael Joseph Blake, of Dearborn Heights, Michigan, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Michigan and this Court by order of September 24, 1993, having suspended the said Michael Joseph Blake from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Michael Joseph Blake be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1305 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LOUIS MICHAEL THRASHER It having been reported to the Court that Louis Michael Thrasher, of Lincoln, Nebraska, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Nebraska and this Court by order of September 24, 1993, having suspended the said Louis Michael Thrasher from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued; It is ordered that the said Louis Michael Thrasher be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1307 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HARVEY N. SHENBERG It having been reported to the Court that Harvey N. Shenberg, of South Miami, Florida, has been suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Florida and this Court by order of September 24, 1993, having suspended the said Harvey N. Shenberg from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Harvey N. Shenberg be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1308 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID GOODHART It having been reported to the Court that David Goodhart, of Miami, Florida, has resigned from the practice of law before the Supreme Court of Florida and this Court by order of September 24, 1993, having suspended the said David Goodhart from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said David Goodhart be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1310 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BERTRAM ZWEIBON It having been reported to the Court that Bertram Zweibon, of New York, New York, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, and this Court by order of September 24, 1993, having suspended the said Bertram Zweibon from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Bertram Zweibon be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1311 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF OMAR Z. GHOBASHY It having been reported to the Court that Omar Z. Ghobashy, of New York, New York, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, and this Court by order of September 24, 1993, having suspended the said Omar Z. Ghobashy from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that a response has been filed; It is ordered that the said Omar Z. Ghobashy be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1312 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JACOB RABINOWITZ It having been reported to the Court that Jacob Rabinowitz, of Brooklyn, New York, has been suspended from the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, and this Court by order of September 24, 1993, having suspended the said Jacob Rabinowitz from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that a response has been filed; It is ordered that the said Jacob Rabinowitz be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1313 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LEONARD HOWARD RUBIN It having been reported to the Court that Leonard Howard Rubin, of Tarrytown, New York, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, and this Court by order of September 24, 1993, having suspended the said Leonard Howard Rubin from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Leonard Howard Rubin be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1314 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SEYMOUR BROWN It having been reported to the Court that Seymour Brown, of New York, New York, has resigned from the practice of law before the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, and this Court by order of September 24, 1993, having suspended the said Seymour Brown from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Seymour Brown be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1315 IN THE MATTER OF KENT HUTCHESON Kent Hutcheson, of Nauvoo, Illinois, having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, heretofore issued on October 18, 1993, is hereby discharged. D-1331 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOSEPH J. O'LEARY It is ordered that Joseph J. O'Leary, of Canton, Ohio, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1332 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN WESLEY DAYS It is ordered that John Wesley Days, of Silver Spring, Maryland, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1333 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STEPHEN ALAN SHARP It is ordered that Stephen Alan Sharp, of Washington, D.C., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. 8 ORIG. ARIZONA V. CALIFORNIA, ET AL. The joint motion of the parties to suspend the briefing schedule set by order of the Court on October 18, 1993, is granted. 65 ORIG. TEXAS V. NEW MEXICO The motion of the River Master for award of fees and expenses is granted and the River Master is awarded a total of $535.54 for the period of July 1 - September 30, 1993, to be paid equally by the parties. 92-8346 SHANNON, TERRY LEE V. UNITED STATES The motion for appointment of counsel is granted and it is ordered that Thomas R. Trout, Esquire, of New Albany, Mississippi, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case. 92-8822 JOHNSON, WILLIE DARNELL V. CALIFORNIA The respondent is requested to file a response to the petition for rehearing within thirty days. 93-781 SINKFIELD, DARRYL, ET AL. V. WESCH, PAUL, ET AL. 93-6747 THIGPEN, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES The motions of petitioners to expedite consideration of petitions for a writs of certiorari are denied. 93-6250 BRUCE, CHARLES B. V. CA DOC, ET AL. The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 20, 1993, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. 93-6253 ALLUM, ROBERT V. SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT CT. The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 20, 1993, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. 93-6273 ANTONELLI, MICHAEL V. O'MALLEY, JACK The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is allowed until December 20, 1993, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. 93-6293 WILLIAMS, WOODROW, ET UX. V. SEEBER, BRIAN, ET AL. The motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioners are allowed until December 20, 1993, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. CERTIORARI GRANTED 93-489 O'MELVENY & MYERS V. FDIC, ETC., ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. 93-356 ) MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. V. AT&T COMPANY ) 93-521 ) UNITED STATES, ET AL. V. AT&T CO., ET AL. The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions. 93-517 ) BD. OF ED. KIRYAS JOEL, ETC. V. GRUMET, LOUIS, ET AL. ) 93-527 ) BD. OF ED. MONROE-WOODBURY V. GRUMET, LOUIS, ET AL. ) 93-539 ) ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK V. GRUMET, LOUIS, ET AL. The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. 93-518 DOLAN, FLORENCE V. TIGARD, OREGON The motion of Northwest Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of National Association of Home Builders, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of Mountain States Legal Foundation, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of Oregon Association of Realtors for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. 93-6497 McFARLAND, FRANK B. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Question 2 presented by the petition. CERTIORARI DENIED 92-9146 VAKSMAN, FABIAN V. BOARD OF TRUSTEES 93-116 FALOON, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 93-226 PARDEE & CURTIN, ETC., ET AL. V. WEBSTER CTY. COMMN. 93-249 CHAGRA, JAMIEL, ET UX. V. CIR 93-288 EXXON CORP., ET AL. V. BOYLE, SUSAN, ETC., ET AL. 93-305 BLANKSTYN, WILLIAM V. CIR 93-324 DIGITRON PACKAGING, INC. V. NLRB 93-332 MICHIGAN MUNICIPAL, ET AL. V. FERC, ET AL. 93-336 BARNETT, RICHARD V. IRS 93-339 BURKE, JAMES, ETC. V. UNITED STATES 93-342 MERCANTILE EMPLOYEES, ET AL. V. BANK ONE, TEXAS, ET AL. 93-348 PGDH LIQUIDATING TRUST, ETC. V. SHALALA, SEC. OF H&HS 93-366 MOUAWAD, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES 93-369 WILLIAMS, FRED V. UNITED STATES 93-372 SAM'S WHOLESALE CLUB, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 93-373 BD. OF ED. ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS V. BD. OF ED. OF ENGLEWOOD 93-382 ) BUTTS, RALPH V. OHIO ) 93-555 ) OHIO V. BUTTS, RALPH 93-400 NY CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY V. McCUMMINGS, BERNARD 93-420 GREEN, ISAIAH V. NC DEPT. TRANSPORTATION 93-421 EICHELBERGER, P.T., ET AL. V. BALETTE, JULES, ET AL. 93-424 TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC. V. SHIPES, FOREST HENRY, ET AL. 93-449 PLATT, PHILEMON V. IHLE, JUDITH, ET AL. 93-455 KILLEEN, VAUGHN, ET AL. V. HALLSTROM, SUE 93-460 BAUGHMAN, SAMMY, ETC. V. SOUTH CAROLINA 93-482 WEICHERT, ROBERT V. RICHARDS, ADMINR., FAA 93-491 CROSTHWAIT EQUIP. CO., ET AL. V. JOHN DEERE CO. 93-502 IN RE A. CORDOVA-GONZALEZ 93-516 HEARTLAND FED. SAVINGS, ETC. V. BRISCOE ENTERPRISES, LTD. 93-519 FEC V. LaROUCHE, LYNDON, ET AL. 93-520 GEOFFREY, INC. V. SC DEPT. OF REVENUE, ETC. 93-522 HURWITZ, NADINE V. PERALES, CESAR, ETC., ET AL. 93-524 LONG ISLAND RR CO. V. BATES, JOHN, ET AL. 93-525 WORLDWIDE INS. MGMT. CORP. V. RESOLUTION TRUST CORP, ETC. 93-526 HERNANDEZ, TONI V. K MART CORP., ET AL. 93-528 GESKE & SONS, INC. V. INTL. UNION, ETC., ET AL. 93-529 LAWLINE, ET AL. V. ABA, ET AL. 93-532 REYER, JAMES V. TODD, WILLIAM, ET AL. 93-533 CAMOSCIO, FRANK V. DONAHUE, JUDGE, SUPER CT. MA 93-536 ) ECHLIN, RAYMOND V. LeCUREUX, WARDEN ) 93-6317 ) JOHNSON, DONALD V. LeCUREUX, WARDEN 93-537 YUTER, SEYMOUR V. TANDEM COMPUTERS INC., ET AL. 93-540 SUNDWALL, ASTRID V. GEN. BLDG. SUPPLY CO. 93-544 MOLINA DE HERNANDEZ, YOLANDA V. ARIZONA 93-545 LAZIRKO, JOHN V. BRICKMAN-ABEGGLEN, M. 93-547 FRONTIER PILOTS LITIGATION V. TX AIR CORP., ET AL. 93-549 LIFSCHULTZ FAST FREIGHT V. CONSOL. FREIGHTWAYS, ET AL. 93-550 J.Z.G. RESOURCES, INC. V. SHELBY INSURANCE CO. 93-554 VELAZQUEZ, AGAPITA, ET AL. V. FIGUEROA-GOMEZ, EDNA, ET AL. 93-570 LANDGRAF, PATRICIA V. McDONNELL DOUGLAS 93-573 WESTFALL, DENNIS V. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES COMPANY 93-576 RIMMER, ROY V. OCTAGON GAS SYSTEMS 93-581 FLETCHER, ALPHONSE V. KIDDER, PEABODY & CO., INC. 93-600 JOHN MORRELL & CO. V. UFCW LOCAL UNION 304A, ET AL. 93-601 MOYER PACKING CO., ET AL. V. PETRUZZI'S INC., ETC. 93-610 McDONALD, ANTHONY V. UNITED STATES 93-616 UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND, ETC. V. OK TAX COMMISSION 93-624 ORR, CHARLES V. GENERAL MOTORS CORP., ETC. 93-625 SCHMIDLING, JACK, ET AL. V. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 93-647 MAGNOLIA BAR ASSN., ET AL. V. HAWKINS, ARMIS, ET AL. 93-649 HOLDEN, CHARLES V. REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTH., ETC. 93-664 KIRATLI, ZITA V. ERSAN RESOURCES, ET AL. 93-5096 MULLINS, BRENTON NEIL V. UNITED STATES 93-5099 KIRSH, MARA, ET VIR V. UNITED STATES 93-5171 KNIGHT, HENRY D. V. VIRGIN ISLANDS 93-5284 JOHNSON-JOHNSON, PEDRO L. V. UNITED STATES 93-5299 KENDALL, CHARLES R. V. KENDALL, LINDA K. 93-5377 SWINNEY, GREG V. UNITED STATES 93-5485 SPEARS, JAMES DAVID V. UNITED STATES 93-5532 WASHINGTON, GEORGE V. UNITED STATES 93-5539 ANIMASHAUN, AKINTUNDE TAOFIK V. INS 93-5568 GAMBRAH, JOHN O. V. UNITED STATES 93-5660 NYBERG, DAVID ANSGAR V. SNOVER, KENNETH R., ET AL. 93-5683 ) SLOAN, JIMMY V. UNITED STATES ) 93-5699 ) DANIELS, MICHAEL, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ) 93-5750 ) GRAY, ANTHONY V. UNITED STATES ) 93-5895 ) HENRY, DEBRA V. UNITED STATES 93-5696 MAXWELL, FREDERICK V. PENNSYLVANIA 93-5703 MYRE, ALFRED E. V. IOWA 93-5718 RUTULANTE, PASQUALE V. GOMEZ, DIR., CA DOC, ET AL. 93-5722 RUPP, ROSIE M. V. HHS 93-5778 BROWN, CLARENCE V. UNITED STATES 93-5803 HENDERSON, ROBERT V. BANK OF NEW ENGLAND 93-5842 BRYANT, VICTOR GEORGE V. MUTH, WILLIAM R., ET AL. 93-5843 BENAVIDES, EDUARDO M. V. BUREAU OF PRISONS 93-5867 DESAMOUR, REYNOLDO V. UNITED STATES 93-5870 BARNETT, RUDOLPH VALENTINO V. UNITED STATES 93-5892 SAMA, PEDRO V. UNITED STATES 93-5894 WHITE, RANDY V. UNITED STATES 93-5906 HODGES, GEORGE M. V. FLORIDA 93-5991 SANTANA, ARI V. UNITED STATES 93-6088 HARRIS, LANEY J. V. SULLIVAN, SEC. OF THE ARMY 93-6098 DE LA GARZA, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES 93-6099 SMITH, LEONARD EDWARD V. TENNESSEE 93-6168 PHILLIPS, REGINALD LESTER V. CHAMPION, WARDEN, ET AL. 93-6178 GROOMS, GWENDOLYN L. V. MOBAY CHEMICAL CORP. 93-6183 MOORHEAD, NORMAN V. TEXAS 93-6195 MAURER, MARTIN K. V. KOENIG, COMMISSIONER 93-6200 TRELLEZ, OSCAR V. NEW YORK 93-6206 DE LOS SANTOS FERRER, MARIA V. UNITED STATES 93-6207 GRIM, ROBERT V. MISSOURI 93-6211 NAUGLE, PHILLIP E. V. UNITED STATES 93-6218 TURNER, ROBERT DOUGLAS V. MURRAY, DIR., VA DOC 93-6226 SCHOKA, ANDRE V. SHERIFF, WASHOE CO. 93-6227 WARD, STEPHEN V. PETERS, HOWARD, ET AL. 93-6233 WINFIELD, R. D. V. MICHIGAN 93-6234 BOROS, GEORGE V. BAXLEY, WILLIAM J., ET AL. 93-6235 ELLIOTT, JOHN W. V. TEXAS 93-6237 JOHNSON, KAY C. V. SOUTH MAIN BANK 93-6238 GOSSETT, CALVIN V. WALKER, SUPT., AUBURN 93-6241 GOFF, GEORGE V. DAILEY, DEPUTY SUPT., ET AL. 93-6242 JAAKKOLA, JOHN V. STATE INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE 93-6254 SLABOCHOVA, BOHUMILA V. WESTFIELD INSURANCE CO. 93-6256 SPREMO, ALFRED V. DURANTE, JOAN, ET AL. 93-6260 MITCHELL, RONALD I. V. KEMNA, SUPT., W. MO C.C. 93-6262 PEARSALL, JOHN W. V. PHILLIPS, VIOTETTE, ET AL. 93-6264 McKEE, DENNIS L. V. NIX, WARDEN 93-6265 NELSON, TERRY V. NEUBERT, ADMINR., BAYSIDE 93-6268 GOLDBERG, MORRIS V. CLEVELAND CLINIC, FLORIDA 93-6271 BARTON, JOHN HENRY V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 93-6272 BROWN, WALTER V. GEORGIA 93-6279 MARTIN, FAVIS CLAY V. UNITED STATES 93-6280 RUPERT, SIGALIT V. SOLEY, DAVID 93-6286 OMASTA, WILLIAM R. V. STOKES, JAMES TED, ET AL. 93-6288 WOHLFORD, WILLIAM, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES 93-6292 HINES, LARRY D. V. THURMAN, WARDEN 93-6299 SCHWARZ, BARBARA V. OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPV. 93-6304 GALAN, RAOUL A. V. GEGENHEIMER, LARRY, ET AL. 93-6311 MITCHELL, ARTHUR V. UNITED STATES 93-6312 MANS, FREDDIE V. UNITED STATES 93-6335 ABATE, TESHOME V. AVENENTI, JOHN, ET AL. 93-6340 CORETHERS, CLARENCE V. OHIO STATE PROSECUTOR 93-6341 CUMMINGS, GEORGE F. V. HUGHES, FRED, ET AL. 93-6342 ANDERSON, GRANT V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ET AL. 93-6347 THORNE, IAN V. UNITED STATES 93-6349 BROOKS, R. L. V. BERGMAN, J. 93-6357 SWENSON, MILLARD V. TRICKEY, WARDEN, ET AL. 93-6358 DEGLI, SEGBEAYA V. UNITED STATES 93-6359 WIATER, PATRICIA V. SHALALA, SEC. OF H&HS 93-6368 TISDALE, ALBERT ALEXANDER V. UNITED STATES 93-6386 CASTRO, JOSE ALFREDO V. UNITED STATES 93-6387 BROCKSMITH, JACK D. V. UNITED STATES 93-6394 RIDEOUT, ROBERT J. V. UNITED STATES 93-6395 PALAZZOLA, DOMINIC V. UNITED STATES 93-6396 ROBINSON, CORIN V. UNITED STATES 93-6397 MEANS, DAVID WAYNE V. UNITED STATES 93-6398 POLANCO, JULIO V. UNITED STATES 93-6399 PARKER, STEVEN ALTONIO V. NEVADA 93-6400 ONWUASOANYA, MARY E. V. UNITED STATES 93-6404 WILLIAMS, RONALD LEE V. FLORIDA 93-6405 SHELTON, BRENDA, ET AL. V. HUGH SCOTT, ET AL. 93-6406 SHELBY, ALAN LAWRENCE V. UNITED STATES 93-6412 SAVAGE, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES 93-6416 CAMACHO, ALEJANDRO V. UNITED STATES 93-6417 SCIRE, FRANK V. UNITED STATES 93-6418 THOMAS, JOSEPH ROLAND V. UNITED STATES 93-6419 REVELS, JAMES E. V. UNITED STATES 93-6420 ROBINSON, CECIL MARIE V. UNITED STATES 93-6422 NUTTLE, DAVID A., ET UX. V. CIR 93-6424 HANNAH, EDMOND L. V. UNITED STATES 93-6425 FORDE, BEVERLY V. UNITED STATES 93-6428 STEPHENS, ROBERT LOUIS V. UNITED STATES 93-6429 BYFIELD, WAYNE V. UNITED STATES 93-6436 ENGLISH, DENNIS L. V. UNITED STATES 93-6439 FROST, DAVID L. V. UNITED STATES 93-6440 VILLANUEVA, DAVID ARIAS V. UNITED STATES 93-6444 HANIF, MOHAMMAD V. UNITED STATES 93-6446 EMRA, DARREL M. V. MAASS, SUPT. 93-6449 PLANCARTE-RAYA, ADOLFO V. UNITED STATES 93-6451 LAWSON, DAVID V. UNITED STATES 93-6452 FINN, ROY R. V. UNITED STATES 93-6453 COSTA, JOHN PAUL V. UNITED STATES 93-6456 COREY, JOHN V. UNITED STATES 93-6464 WILLIS, JOHN V. RISON, WARDEN, ET AL. 93-6465 DOPICO, FRANK V. UNITED STATES 93-6467 CIANCA, VICTOR S. V. UNITED STATES 93-6470 MUZINGO, GLEN ALAN V. UNITED STATES 93-6483 McFARLAND, FRANK BASIL V. TEXAS 93-6484 SIMMONS, LARRY BARBENTEN V. MARYLAND 93-6485 MUNIZ, LEO ORLANDO V. UNITED STATES 93-6488 PAZEL, DEANNA MARIE V. UNITED STATES 93-6489 LOVETT, AARON KEITH V. UNITED STATES 93-6490 McWHORTER, DAVID V. UNITED STATES 93-6504 MOREJON-GOMEZ, PEDRO V. UNITED STATES 93-6505 JONES, ROY M. V. UNITED STATES 93-6514 WILLIAMS, BILLY V. FOWLER, CAPTAIN 93-6525 PLEDGER, ANDREW JAMES V. UNITED STATES 93-6526 OAKS, MARY CERCILE V. UNITED STATES 93-6529 MANTILLA, EDUARDO V. UNITED STATES 93-6530 NIX, KIRKSEY McCORD V. UNITED STATES 93-6531 NEKU, SABELO T. V. UNITED STATES 93-6536 MERKL, G. BRADFORD V. HARDY, DANIEL T., ET AL. 93-6541 KABA, KARAMO B. V. UNITED STATES 93-6561 SMITH, DONALD ROY V. UNITED STATES 93-6564 GRAHAM, FREDERICK V. UNITED STATES The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. 93-319 RASCH, STEPHEN V. NATL. RR PASSENGER CORP. 93-615 ATKINS, REYNALDO V. UNITED STATES 93-5990 ABDULLAH, MUSTAFA A. V. FBI 93-6458 FREEMAN, DAVID R. V. UNITED STATES The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice Ginsburg took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions. 93-432 MORALES, JOSE, ET AL. V. BARGE-WAGENER, ETC., ET AL. The motion of National Employment Lawyers Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of United States of Mexico, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 93-451 WHITLEY, HAROL, ET AL. V. STANDEN, WARREN The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 93-510 AETNA LIFE INS. CO., ET AL. V. STUART CIRCLE HOSP. CORP. The motion of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of CIGNA for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of Travelers Insurance Company, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of Association of Private Pension and Welfare Benefit Plans for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of National Coordinating Committee for Multiemployer Plans for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of Connecticut Business and Industry Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of American Council of Life Insurance for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of Group Health Association of America, Inc. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of Health Insurance Association of America, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 93-559 CO ST. BD. OF AG. V. ROBERTS, JENNIFER, ET AL. The motion of Alabama Association of School Boards, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of Brown University, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of American Council on Education, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 93-562 McMANUS, E. J., ETC. V. IOWA, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. 93-6407 GAFFNEY, RUPERT E. V. ARIZONA The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. HABEAS CORPUS DENIED 93-5204 IN RE JUSTIN ROGERS ROUTT 93-6642 IN RE SUE MONROE The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied. MANDAMUS DENIED 93-6175 IN RE THOMAS CONBOY 93-6291 IN RE EDWARD N. NEWTOP The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied. 93-557 IN RE DONALD JOHNSON 93-6203 IN RE CLARENCE CORETHERS The petitions for writs of mandamus and/or prohibition are denied. REHEARINGS DENIED 92-1806 MEYER, CHARLES V. LELSZ, JOHN, ET AL. 92-1827 BONA, FRANK V. CHAVEZ, MANUEL, ET AL. 92-1869 BULLWINKLE, WALTER V. ALASKA 92-1881 THOMSEN, NADINE V. JUVENILE DEPT., ET AL. 92-1997 CARTER, WILFRED V. CERTIFIED GROCERS CALIFORNIA 92-2027 WOODS, JOHN V. UNITED STATES 92-2045 SMITH, BOBBY, ET AL. V. SHALALA, SEC. H&HS 92-2061 SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA, INC. V. HENDERSON, RUSSELL, ET AL. 92-8182 ABDULLAH, SHAKUR V. NEBRASKA 92-8474 MILLER-EL, THOMAS JOE V. TEXAS 92-8732 BRANNON, JAMES J. V. LAMAINA, STEPHENIE 92-8766 JOHNSON, ROBERT V. DETROIT COLLEGE, ET AL. 92-8776 ROSE, VERNON LEE V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 92-8867 BURNS, WILLIAM V. TEXAS 92-8871 YOUNG, KEITH V. GROOSE, WARDEN 92-8941 HUFF, OSCAR V. ABC ENTERPRISES, INC. 92-8947 CORRIGAN, JOHN L. V. TOMPKINS, JoANNE L., ET AL. 92-8949 HARRIS, CURT Q. V. SACRAMENTO COUNTY, ET AL. 92-8952 SCHULTZ, JAMES V. WISCONSIN 92-8972 HELMS, DEWEY L. V. REYNOLDS, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-8999 BOUNDS, JOE A. V. UNITED STATES 92-9025 STEELE, VERNETTA V. CALIFORNIA DEPT. SOC. SERV. 92-9041 BURGER, CHRISTOPHER A. V. ZANT, WARDEN 92-9077 CLARK, ALAN DALE V. NAGLE, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-9106 FOX, STEPHAN H. V. HUTTON, JEROME D., ET AL. 92-9168 SCOTT, SAMUEL V. TYSON FOODS, INC. 92-9179 IN RE ASUQUO NKOP 92-9192 McFALL, EARL V. WILKINSON, WALLACE, ET AL. 92-9193 LANE, RONNY JOE V. RAMEY, TOM B., ET AL. 92-9202 CRAYTON, DAVID LYNN V. KENTUCKY 92-9203 AGRON, BATYAH LEVI V. CLINTON, PRES. OF U.S. 92-9235 CATO, RALPH V. MORALES, ATTY. GEN. OF TX 93-20 JOHNSTON, LYNN V. ZEFF & ZEFF, ET AL. 93-26 DUNCAN, CARL V. COBB, WARREN, ET AL. 93-40 SCINTO, JOHN V. STAMM, R. DAVID, ET AL. 93-42 MITCHELL, HARRY, ET UX. V. CIR 93-124 MICK, PETER, ET AL. V. RESOLUTION TRUST CORP. 93-153 ARNOLD, GEORGE V. LEONARD, ROBERT, ET AL. 93-200 COWHIG, EDWARD V. STONE, SEC. OF THE ARMY 93-237 MALONEY, DANIEL V. UNITED STATES, ET AL. 93-243 JAMES, JOE, ET UX. V. LIVONIA, MICHIGAN, ET AL. 93-354 LOOMIS, WENDELL V. WALLIS & SHORT, P.C. 93-368 DUNNING, ROBERT V. CIR 93-5010 RUCHMAN, FRANCES, ET AL. V. WOLFF, L., ET AL. 93-5011 POMPE, AGNES V. YONKERS, ET AL. 93-5030 BROWN, MELVIN A. V. CHICOPEE FIRE FIGHTERS 93-5058 DEOBLER, BRUCE V. KINTZELE, JACK, ET AL. 93-5112 LOUCKS, KATHY, ET AL. V. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY 93-5116 PARTEE, ELLIS O. V. PETERS, DIR., IL DOC, ET AL. 93-5124 JOHNSON, JAMES V. HARDCASTLE, JIM, ET AL. 93-5130 ALCALA, RODNEY JAMES V. CALIFORNIA 93-5198 LORENZO, WINDYCESLAU V. UNITED STATES 93-5287 WILLIAMS, ANNIE, ET VIR V. TRUMBAUER, ALICE, ET AL. 93-5295 ATHERTON, PETER JAMES V. VIRGINIA 93-5300 HALEY, REGINALD J. V. BORG, WARDEN, ET AL. 93-5316 DEMAURO, LOUIS V. COLDWELL, BANKER, ET AL. 93-5347 WALTON, JEFFREY ALAN V. ARIZONA 93-5383 RAMSEY, MELODY V. OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 93-5388 WEAVER, RONALD V. KAYE, WILLIAM, ET AL. 93-5389 WEAVER, RONALD V. STRINE, JOHN, ET AL. 93-5433 SIEGEL, RICHARD V. BERKEIMER ASSOCIATES 93-5479 SHAW, CHARLES WARREN V. MISSOURI 93-5558 GACY, JOHN W. V. WELBORN, WARDEN, ET AL. 93-5583 SWAIN, JOYCELINE V. DETROIT BD. OF ED. 93-5624 WHITSON, DARIUS V. HILLHAVEN WEST, INC., ET AL. 93-5633 O'DONNELL, MICHAEL JAMES V. AMER. CAREER TRAINING CORP. 93-5648 BARKER, WAYNE ERNEST V. COLLINS, DIR. TX DCJ 93-5725 VOLLBRECHT, TERRY V. WISCONSIN 93-5733 IN RE MACK W. CAMPBELL 93-5772 CHERRY, ROBERT V. RATELLE, WARDEN, ET AL. 93-5773 DeROSA, JOSEPH V. NEW YORK 93-5837 ANDERSON, GRANT V. UNITED STATES 93-5987 PAUL, THOMAS J. V. CIR The petitions for rehearing are denied. 92-1947 WOODS, EDWARD V. AT&T INFO. SYSTEMS, ET AL. The petition for rehearing is denied. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. 93-222 McCOO, SAMUEL V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA The petition for rehearing is denied. Justice Ginsburg took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION The written motions for admission of the following lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted: